Internet Press Release - for immediate release
MICHAEL NEW LEGAL DEFENSE FUND

5-30-2001

SPC MICHAEL NEW FILES MOTION WITH CAAF

(District of Columbia) - LTC Henry Hamilton (US Army, ret.) filed a motion this week with the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) asking that they quit stalling and issue a ruling, one way or the other in the case of Army Spc. Michael New.  The case has not moved for fifteen months, since oral arguments were heard before the court on February 4, 2001.  The case has been working on appeal from his original court-martial since January, 1996 -- over six years.

Spc. New is the first American ever charged with the crime of wanting to wear his own nation's uniform.  He is not, however, the first to experience how the Pentagon and the military justice machine can drag its feet and stonewall those seeking a speedy trial and Constitutional solutions. 

According to Daniel New, father of the beleaguered soldier, "The Army will not admit, of course, that this is anything but a simple case of disobeying a direct and 'lawful order.'  But most Americans instinctively realize that when all the evidence demonstrating that the order was unlawful is buried, and the jury is not allowed to even look at the evidence, then the hand of powerful forces is clearly at work.  What stumps us is why there are still a few men in uniform who can't see that this soldier was standing up for all of them, and for the Constitution to which they all took the same oath."

Hamilton said in the motion, "Comes now the undersigned civilian appellate defense counsel, ... and moves this Court to render its decision in the above-captioned case or, in the alternative, to issue an appropriate communication to the parties concerning the status of the appeal and the reasons for the decision's delay...." 

Hamilton also implied in the brief that the court is damaging its own reputation with this extraordinary delay without a single word of explanation for over a year.  He wrote to the Court, "It is in the interests of justice and the appearance of justice for this Honorable Court to render its decision at this time." 

The complete text of the motion is on our website:
http://www.mikenew.com/motiontorule.html
        
If the court ever decides to rule on this very important case, there are two obvious alternatives.  If they rule in favor of Spc. New, they will overturn the court-martial, and that will leave the Army with a long list of alternatives, including a simple termination from the Army.  If the Court rules in favor of the Army, then Spc. New's attorneys will file a petition of certiorari with the Supreme Court to hear and rule on the single question before this court. 

In the meantime, "justice delayed is justice denied."


Contact:        Daniel New, Project Manager     
                Michael New Action Fund
                Michael New Legal Defense Fund
                This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
                http://www.mikenew.com/

Real Americans don't wear U.N. blue!


Historical source: update6-2k1.html